BY EDMUND SMITH-ASANTE, BACK FROM THE NETHERLANDS
So for the Water Integrity Network (WIN), a grouping of hundreds of organisations worldwide concerned about integrity issues in the delivery of water and sanitation services to organise the first ever Water Integrity Forum (WIF), must be seen as a very bold step.
H. E. Betty Bigombe, Teun Bastemeijer and Ulysses Ocran Hammond |
Though corruption and the issue of integrity
in institutions and among individuals have existed over the years, they have
often been spoken of with muffled voices.
While people are quick to admit in private
that corruption pervades the air, those same people are unwilling to publicly
admit that it is an issue that seriously hampers the delivery of services and
when in public speak about it with a hush.
The reason is that many see it as a very
sensitive and delicate issue to be spoken of in public, lest one loses favour
with the powers that be or is blacklisted in the award of contracts or be
branded as cowards, not being smart, anti-social and ‘enemies of progress’.
So for the Water Integrity Network (WIN), a grouping of hundreds of organisations worldwide concerned about integrity issues in the delivery of water and sanitation services to organise the first ever Water Integrity Forum (WIF), must be seen as a very bold step.
The over 60 organisations and over
100 participants at the forum in Delft, The Netherlands from June 5, 2013 to
June 7, 2013 minced no words in addressing the issue in seven work streams that
tackled Water, Energy and Food; Water Resource Management in River Basins;
Rural Water, Sanitation and Hygiene; Integrated Urban Water Management; Tools
to Diagnose and Access Integrity; Tools to Improve, Build and Improve Integrity
and Processes to Scale Up Integrity.
In an interview with Teun Bastemeijer,
Director, Water Integrity Network Secretariat (WIN-S), a wing of Transparency
International (TI), he said the first ever Water Integrity Forum (WIF) was held
based on a demand from partners of the Water Integrity Network (WIN) earlier on
but which could not be held then because the partnership was made up of small
NGOs which could not organise it then.
However, since then things have improved with
partners such as UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education and some individual
consultants coming on board to make it a reality, he said.
Touching on the aim of the forum, the WIN-S
director said it was meant to start taking stock of their work and also look at
solutions that have been found to deal with issues from different sides, to
come together to make different alliances to scale up with more organisations
on the issue of integrity from different perspectives.
Water Integrity Network (WIN) is a mission
that was started by some worried water professionals who in their day-to-day
activities encounter the issue of corruption that hampers access to water and
sanitation by either having to be part of it or circumvent it, he divulged.
According to Teun Bastemeijer, decision
makers, grassroots organisations and international networks are needed to talk
about change in attitudes, not as a crime, but as a phenomenon in such a way as
to reach the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in a sustainable and equitable
way with a maximum of integrity. “So integrity is about honesty and honesty
includes being clear [about] where the issues are,” he noted.
On what WIN-S seeks to do after the
conference, he stated; “Next step is reconfirmation of adherence to the
outcomes of the forum, to find partners that can help deal from the inside or
from the outside in getting to the right sort of dialogue and diagnostic
exercises in various countries that can be at the lower level and can also be
at the national level – it can be about water basin, it can be about rural
water supply sector, but somewhere you have to have a start depending on the
country and the context, you have to make choices, and that I think is what
will happen in the next steps.”
Making a good link to the human rights issue
and other positive conventions or declarations might help to come to the right
sort of discussions in countries, the WIN director said.
“We need to get decision makers and political
people on board, including city mayors, including ministers. That is why we
also have the AMCOW statement here made by the minister from Uganda. These are
things that help a lot but on the other hand we cannot get a lot further if we
do not create evidence that we can actually do something,” he added.
On whether he had experienced any incidents
of corruption in the WASH sector, Teun Bastemeijer, intimated that many years
ago as a young man, he realised in a huge project in Tanzania “There was some
kind of a corrupt deal between the lead consultant from Denmark in that
particular case and the national engineers from the water authority, where they
could take pipes.”
“Now, their excuse was about the cost of
pipes and 30 per cent of the pipes had disappeared and my report on that was
initially not accepted by the donor, because the report was too sensitive. That
was pure corruption, but including the donor,” he added.
Responding to allegations of WIN’s soft
approach to dealing with corruption in the water, sanitation and hygiene
sector, the director explained it is not very wise to take a tough approach,
because “you will not be welcome in the country, you will not get any political
leadership involved. So you can call it soft; there is also some level of
diplomacy needed.”
He however added that in one-on-one
discussions he has held with ministers and regulators among others, he has been
very blunt on the issue of corruption, pointing out that even among journalists
there have always been instances of corruption when reports have been made to
favour others.
“The donors supporting us right now are the
Germans, the Swedes, the Dutch and the Swiss and they are very genuine in these
things and they do not accept corruption. Some of them actually signed our code
of conduct and others have similar rules that they have introduced and they
also call us to prove that we are not engaged in any corrupt action - Our
donors are aware that this must be dealt with,” Bastemeijer said in response to
allegations of corruption among some of WIN’s partners.
“We do not work with angels so we are happy
to work with associations who are making efforts to improve, so it is not as if
we are against the World Bank or the Asian development and what have you –
no!,” he admitted.
He announced his joy of having banks such as
the African Development Bank (AfDB) on board which has already conducted a
study in the water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) sector on corruption.
Touching on how governments of different
states, especially in Africa receive them (WIN) knowing they are an
organisation fighting corruption, the WIN director intimated they sometimes
through correspondence to ministers of state ask for meetings or get invited by
embassies which are engaged in some work in the water sector in those countries
and wish to talk about good governance.
“What does not work is to go there, and
suddenly be there and say here I am and I want to see you and can we talk
corruption,” he stated.
In another interview with Her Excellency
Betty Oyella Bigombe, Minister of State for Water, Ministry of Water and
Environment, Uganda, on the African perspective of integrity in the water
sector, she stated: “Political will is paramount – it is really what anchors
it. If you do not have political will it is very difficult.
The minister however said it was difficult
for her to answer if African governments have political will or not. “That is a
difficult question – I cannot accuse other people,” she said.
On what she was taking back to her colleagues
in Africa from the forum, Betty Bigombe said: “What I have learnt is that it is
not just government – Honesty - somebody talked about it yesterday – It is
important. But the other thing too, for instance when you have big projects
coming up, and you have companies from the Western world coming in, they still
bribe, so it takes two to tango. Procurement is where things go wrong and that
is where you have a lot of hurdles and therefore procurement within that
procurement process – It is very important that we have people with a bit of
integrity.”
On the role of the African Ministers Council
on Water (AMCOW), the Ugandan Minister stated; “In principle in AMCOW, we have
agreed on all this – what we should do, but the problem too, is that – I talked
about political will - if you want to fight corruption you must have a budget
that shows commitment. You must have the human resources or turn to the donor
community, development partners to see if they can provide both.”
Admitting that AMCOW does not have a peer
review mechanism in place, Betty Bigombe opined that the council’s secretariat
in Abuja, Nigeria could commission a study into such mechanism then convene a
meeting to discuss some of these issues.
Confessing also that currently AMCOW does not
have in place a system for dealing with corruption in the sector by member
countries, she added that having been so inspired by the forum she was going to
suggest it is included in the agenda of the council’s next meeting.
She acknowledged too, that it will take
strong leadership to ensure commitments signed by African governments at
international fora are followed through, saying it will be better to have one
strong African country lead the process that all others will follow, than
leaving each country to do its own thing.
The foundation is service delivery, the
Ugandan Minister said, in response to a question on what motivated her country
to go on to become a model for Africa in water and sanitation service delivery.
She intimated that although so much has been
pumped into the water and sanitation sector despite the other challenges the
country has, they realised they needed a more proactive approach if they were
to meet their millennium development goal targets.
H.E. Betty Bigombe disclosed further that in
2009, Uganda formed a forum for discussion on integrity and thereafter a study
was commissioned to see how it can be combated throughout all the country’s
districts.
She indicated that when they realised dealing
with just the headquarters was not effective in dealing with what was going on,
the idea was born of decentralisation.
Uganda has also formed a sector working group
comprising government officials, civil society organisations, the private
sector and development partners, she intimated.
Betty Bigombe said: “This is very important
in the sense that it is critical that to be able to enhance integrity or to
fight corruption you have to have a multi stakeholders’ forum, so that they
stop trading accusations against one another.”
While indicating at such forum all
stakeholders including development partners may admit their challenges and work
on their weaknesses to enhance integrity, she said: “But on the other hand too,
sometimes the sector may not control or have power over the procurement
process. It might not have power or control over the auditor general’s query of
what it is exactly on.”
The other thing we have in Uganda is, the
judiciary, the attorney general’s office, solicitor general actually has to
give no objection for any memorandum of understanding for any contract,” she
indicated.
“Now at the same time we do not have control
over the judiciary, so we need to be of partnership within the government
system itself to fight corruption, so that the procurement team is talking with
the sector people, so that the judiciary is talking with the sector people,
because in all this there is a lot of manipulation, she stated.
Touching on corruption at the lower level,
H.E. Bigombe referred to illegal connection of utility services where someone
has not paid his/her bill but pays probably an equivalent of US$10 to someone
who works at the utility service and gets connected, saying because this cannot
be detected immediately, the loss is attributed to leakage.
“So all this needs strong partnerships to
work together with everybody so that it can be enhanced,” she stressed.
“In our case as far as human resources is
concerned we received support from Water Integrity Network, we’ve also received
support from GIZ, where expatriates have been brought in to help us monitor the
process, to conduct a study, which study has then helped us [with] this
discussion.
Later in a chat with Ulysses Ocran Hammond,
Environmental Management Plan Coordinator for the Volta Dam in Ghana, he stated
that the forum was very significant because Ghana as a member of the
International Hydropower Association (IHA) has subscribed to a protocol, which
is an agreement that IHA has come up with that encompasses all the issues
associated with dam construction, right from feasibility studies, construction
and operational phases.
It is a kind of index to measure one’s
performance in the planning of a hydropower project, whether there has been
enough public consultation, due diligence regarding the environment among
others, all of which helps in situating projects very well, he said.
According to Ulysses Ocran, there are some
parameters in the protocol, which will help eliminate suspicion of biases,
suspicion of issues about integrity and whether due processes have been
followed.
“For hydropower projects, one of the key
issues are displacement of people, so if you do not have enough consultation,
enough deliberations with the people who are going to be directly impacted by
the project, both upstream and downstream, it gives cause for the people who
are going to be displaced to feel that something has gone really very wrong in
the implementation – even in the siting of the project,” he said.
“But when you subject yourself to a protocol
like this, where one of the criteria is public disclosure…then it tends to
eliminate the thinking or the fear of the people that this is a government
project and irrespective of what we feel, maybe government has been compromised
in a way to do this project at the expense of our livelihoods,” Ulysses Ocran
stated further.
“Integrity issues do not only border on
money. You can decide to situate a hydropower project at a place where the
impact will be so significant but for certain reasons you might want to situate
the project there at the expense of the environment and people going to be
displaced and all that –you cannot actually quantify whether money has changed
hands and all that but it is someone’s decision to make sure this is done and
when you go to the protocol it eliminates all these things,” he submitted.
For her part, Aziza Akhmouch, Lead, Water
Governance Programme, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development
(OECD), stated when delivering a keynote address during the opening of the
forum that the sector is highly fragmented, while fragmented responsibilities
pave the way for corruption.
Reiterating that fragile institutions allow
corruption, she indicated that corruption is also an issue for rich OECD
countries.
She spoke on the topic, “The importance of
governance in the water sector and the need to bring in an integrity and
transparency perspective in the post 2015 agenda”.
Christian Poortman, Senior Advisor,
Transparency International who also delivered a keynote address titled “Main
trends and findings, corruption and integrity”, asserted that there remain many
challenges to bring integrity to the water sector, but hoped the forum will
bring out commitments from all partners.
No comments:
Post a Comment